Walk/Don’t Walk signs can be very
helpful when crossing a street. Like stop lights for automobiles
they help control the flow of traffic. Without them it would be
close to impossible to get across a busy intersection. They are
really convenient when intersections have turn arrows for
automobiles. Even should cross traffic be at a stop nothing can ruin
a day like being hit by a car turning into the path we’re walking.
But are they absolutely necessary?
I’m talking about when the walk path
is clear, no cars are coming –or are a significant distance away to
not cause injury or death- and the sign indicates “Don’t Walk”.
Should we stay or should we go? Should we cross the street because
we can or should we stay put because the sign says so? Do we put all
our faith and trust in a machine to tell us when to walk safely or
should we use our own intellectual abilities to reason as to when it
is safe to walk? When the sign says emphatically “Don’t Walk”
although our intellect tells us it is safe to do so, do we obey the
sign or our own confidence in accomplishing the task before us, that
being crossing the street safely?
I do not raise these questions idly.
I have too often seen people standing at a street corner with no
oncoming traffic and not attempting to cross for no other reason than
that a little square box with a red phrase told them not to walk.
These people put more faith in that mechanical sign than in their own
common sense. They obey a machine that tells them not to do
something they clearly could do instead of obeying themselves.
What does this say about humanity when
they more readily obey a machine, while helpful is not the final say
on our behavior, instead of our own common sense? What does this say
about people who defer solely to a machine instead of themselves when
they could clearly make a decision to take the initiative and
override the machine’s instructions?
Are we getting too good at following
orders? Are we becoming so good at being told what to do that we
cannot cross a street confidently without first getting an other’s
permission? In this case a machine’s permission? What does it say
about us if we cannot act of our own volition but must wait for
permission to do something we are clearly capable of doing all by
ourselves?
If we cannot cross the street safely
without first getting someone or something else’s permission what
more does that say about our individual abilities? Can we trust the
people to critically think? Take the initiative? Problem solve?
Take responsibility? Question Authority?
One can tell a lot about a person just
by the way they cross a street. And what it tells us isn’t good.
And election day is coming up.
No comments:
Post a Comment